Arizona Daily Wildcat advertising info
UA news
world news
sports
arts
perspectives
comics
crossword
cat calls
police beat
photo features
classifieds
archives
search
advertising

UA Football
UA Basketball
restaurant, bar and party guide
FEEDBACK
Write a letter to the Editor

Contact the Daily Wildcat staff

Send feedback to the web designers


AZ STUDENT MEDIA
Arizona Student Media info...

Daily Wildcat staff alumni...

TV3 - student tv...

KAMP - student radio...

Wildcat Online Banner

Missile defense accord unlikely

By Associated Press
ARIZONA DAILY WILDCAT
Thursday November 15, 2001

CRAWFORD, Texas - As talks between President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin shifted to Bush's Texas ranch, White House officials said yesterday that an accord on anti-missile defenses is not in the cards for this summit.

"Don't look for anything of that nature," White House press secretary Ari Fleischer told reporters on the second day of talks between Bush and Putin.

"This is one stop along the road. We'll make other stops after Crawford, but each stop is built on the positive results of the earlier meetings."

On this stop, at the president's rural, 1,600-acre Prairie Chapel Ranch, Bush was focused on building his budding personal relationship with Putin.

After Putin's afternoon arrival, he and his wife were being treated to what one aide called "a finger-lickin' Texas dinner" of guacamole, peppered beef, smoked catfish and pecan pie.

Gray skies threatened to dampen the open-air picnic, but Bush remained eager for "an informal chance to break bread and to cover new ground and to improve relations that are already good," Fleischer said.

Both leaders affirmed Tuesday they had too many nuclear weapons. Both spoke of slashing their arsenals of long-range warheads to about one-third the current size. Bush prefers an informal arrangement; Putin prefers a traditional arms control accord.

But both also are signaling they are flexible, giving every indication that procedure will not block their intent to do away with thousands of nuclear weapons.

Bush, who took the first step at a White House news conference after meeting with Putin for three hours in the Oval Office, said his proposal to set a new U.S. ceiling of 1,700 to 2,200 long-range warheads over the next decade was "fully

consistent with American security."

"The current levels of our nuclear forces do not reflect today's strategic realities," he said before leaving for his home in Crawford, Texas.

Putin matched him in a speech later at the Russian Embassy.

"Security is created not by piles of metal or weapons," Putin said. "It is created by political will of people, nation-state and their leaders."

So, the Russian president said, in light of a new and warm U.S.-Russian relationship, Russia can afford to reduce its arsenal to one-third or less.

The United States now has about 7,000 intercontinental-range nuclear warheads and Russia about 5,800.

Still, Putin said, he preferred codifying the reductions in formal agreements. "The world is far from having international relations based solely on trust, unfortunately," he said.

And Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said Russia would keep pushing for a formal agreement. "To make it more reliable, we need to put it down in a treaty," he said. "It doesn't mean we distrust anyone. Just the opposite. It would consolidate and boost our relations."

Bush, on the other hand, said he saw no need for "endless hours" of negotiations.

But both leaders signaled their willingness to compromise.

Swinging a deal on anti-missile defenses is likely to be more difficult.

Senior administration officials told The Associated Press they did not expect an agreement on missile defenses before the summit talks end later today in Texas.

Bush wants to go ahead with a testing program that inevitably will run up against the prohibitions of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty.

Putin, who considers the treaty a cornerstone of arms control, said "the position of Russia remains unchanged."

Even so, there apparently is room for bargaining, if not this week then when Bush goes to Moscow, possibly in January.

"Let's look together at what tests you need," Ivanov said. "If such tests don't violate the treaty, why discard it? We don't think that the ABM treaty is outdated."

If they were at a dead end, Bush likely would assert the right to withdraw from the treaty. But a senior U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the president would not take that final step during the current talks.

Bush hopes to persuade Putin to allow the United States to proceed with research and development of a missile shield without declaring the work a violation of the 1972 pact. In exchange, Bush promised Putin to keep Russia informed of the tests. U.S. officials said the proposal would give both men what they want: Bush could begin developing a missile shield, and Putin could tell his public that he kept the ABM intact.

Finding common ground in other areas, the two leaders formalized a series of agreements to combat bioterrorism, bolster the Russian economy, battle money laundering that finances terrorism and strengthen Russia's ties to NATO - the 19-member military alliance formed to counter Moscow in the Cold War.

Meanwhile, the Council for a Livable World, a private group that advocates arms control, said Bush's decision to reduce the U.S. arsenal was "a good first step that has been a long time in coming."

But, the Council said, there needs to be verification, counting rules and a procedure for dismantling the retired weapons.

"President Bush may be able to see into President Putin's soul, but today's verbal agreement can become tomorrow's misunderstanding," the Council said in a statement.

 
WORLD NEWS


advertising info

UA NEWS | WORLD NEWS | SPORTS | ARTS | OPINIONS | COMICS
CLASSIFIEDS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT US | SEARCH
Webmaster - webmaster@wildcat.arizona.edu
© Copyright 2001 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat - Arizona Student Media