Search

ARCHIVES
CONTACT US
WORLD NEWS

Cotton winner not misled

To the editor,

I am writing in response to the story on a "misled UA student" currently waging battle against the Phoenix Cotton Women for false advertising. Biased stories like these show that abuse of power by the media begins at a relatively tender age.

Ms. Everett-Haynes (a Wildcat reporter) interviewed me, via e-mail about this issue, but somehow my chance to explain the other side of the issue was spliced and diced until it was unrecognizable, even to me.

While the duties of Maid of Cotton are extensive, that was made clear to all the young women interested in pursuing the title, from the beginning.

I know, because it was my responsibility to make it clear! A list of all the events I attended as Maid was typed and given to each candidate, two months before the actual contest. I explained, repeatedly, the commitment and dedication involved. In fact, several girls withdrew, finding themselves unable to commit the amount of time required. I may ask why Ms. Ching was not among those, but now is righteously vowing to never miss a class.

As for false advertising charge against the Phoenix Cotton Women, I find it absurd. Posters placed around campus listed that the winner of the Arizona Maid of Cotton contest was to receive, among many other things, a $2,500 scholarship. It did not stipulate when this was awarded, but isn't it highly unusual to expect to receive a paycheck before any work is done?

Anastasia Ching said the "resigning is something shameful." I do not see anything "shameful" about giving something up if you are unable or unwilling to perform the duties required. Personally, I find it far more shameful to knowingly take on a responsibility that you do not have the time, desire or means to complete.

Jennifer Hume

Veterinary science senior

1998-99 Arizona Maid of Cotton