Arizona Daily Wildcat advertising info
UA news
world news
sports
arts
perspectives
comics
crossword
cat calls
police beat
photo features
special reports
classifieds
archives
search
advertising

UA Basketball
Housing Guide - Spring 2002
restaurant, bar and party guide
FEEDBACK
Write a letter to the Editor

Contact the Daily Wildcat staff

Send feedback to the web designers


AZ STUDENT MEDIA
Arizona Student Media info...

Daily Wildcat staff alumni...

TV3 - student tv...

KAMP - student radio...

Wildcat Online Banner
Articles
Thursday Mar. 7, 2002

Letters to the Editor

ASUA editorial hypocritical

I personally find it odd that the Wildcat is claiming that the majority of the ASUA Senate candidates are incompetent and don't have real platforms, yet for some reason the Wildcat (endorsed) 10 candidates. It seems well implied by the editorial on Tuesday that many fewer than 10 of the students running are qualified for that position. Why then will the Wildcat endorse candidates who are not qualified for their position? While, regardless of qualification, 10 students will be elected tomorrow. Logic would state that if six candidates are qualified, then they and they alone should be voted for, but by endorsing other not qualified candidates, it will make it a much closer race and possibly limit the qualified persons elected. [Read article]

 

UA NEWS | WORLD NEWS | SPORTS | ARTS | PERSPECTIVES | COMICS
CLASSIFIEDS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT US | SEARCH

advertising info

Webmaster - webmaster@wildcat.arizona.edu
© Copyright 2001 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat - Arizona Student Media