Letters to the Editor
ASUA editorial hypocritical
I personally find it odd that the Wildcat is claiming that the majority of the ASUA Senate candidates are incompetent and don't have real platforms, yet for some reason the Wildcat (endorsed) 10 candidates. It seems well implied by the editorial on Tuesday that many fewer than 10 of the students running are qualified for that position. Why then will the Wildcat endorse candidates who are not qualified for their position? While, regardless of qualification, 10 students will be elected tomorrow. Logic would state that if six candidates are qualified, then they and they alone should be voted for, but by endorsing other not qualified candidates, it will make it a much closer race and possibly limit the qualified persons elected.
[Read article]
