Arizona Daily Wildcat advertising info
UA news
world news
sports
arts
perspectives
comics
crossword
cat calls
police beat
photo features
special reports
classifieds
archives
search
advertising

UA Basketball
Housing Guide - Spring 2002
restaurant, bar and party guide
FEEDBACK
Write a letter to the Editor

Contact the Daily Wildcat staff

Send feedback to the web designers


AZ STUDENT MEDIA
Arizona Student Media info...

Daily Wildcat staff alumni...

TV3 - student tv...

KAMP - student radio...

Wildcat Online Banner

UA administrators hopeful Hull will veto parts of state budget

By Cyndy Cole
Arizona Daily Wildcat
Wednesday Mar. 20, 2002

Provision added late Monday would translate into a larger UA budget cut

University administrators will have to find almost $1 million more to return to the state if a provision in the state budget passes by the governor this week.

In the new budget that is likely to pass both houses of the Legislature today or tomorrow, all state agencies are required to cut an additional 0.25 percent of their state-allocated funds.

In the University of Arizona's case, this figure translates to just more than $850,000, which would bring the university's total cut for this year to approximately $16.7 million.

"It's better than the half-percent cut the House was proposing, and we have no hope of avoiding it," said UA lobbyist Greg Fahey.

Fahey added that it is considered certain that Hull will pass this provision.

In fact, getting by with a cut that amounts to 0.25 percent for the UA is better news than expected, said Joel Valdez, senior vice president of business affairs, and Randy Richardson, vice president for undergraduate education.

Richardson said UA President Peter Likins' cabinet has not decided whether to make the cuts across-the-board or target them at specific university units.

Late Monday afternoon, legislators also re-added a provision to cut funding for vacant UA positions in half, but they expect the governor to line-item veto that provision later this week.

If Gov. Jane Dee Hull were to sign the budget without a line-item veto, UA could face more than a 10 percent - or $35 million - cut in state funding, depending upon how many UA employees leave their jobs beginning this summer.

But Sen. Ruth Solomon said Hull's veto is in the bag and that the provision was merely added at the request of House Speaker Jim Weiers, enabling him to symbolically hold the Republican line by limiting government spending.

"Hull will absolutely veto (the provision)" said Solomon, chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Francie Noyes, spokeswoman for the governor, disagrees.

She said Hull has yet to decide what to do with any specific provisions in the state budget, including the provision for vacant positions.

Furthermore, Hull's line-item veto is reserved for numbers in the budget, not language or policy decisions like reduced funding in the vacant position provision, Noyes said.

The matter will likely be settled this week, if lawmakers get the state budget to Hull today as planned.

Both the House and Senate are simultaneously moving nearly identical bills through in hopes of getting the 2002 state budget finished and moving on to fiscal year 2003, which starts in July.

ARTICLES

advertising info

UA NEWS | WORLD NEWS | SPORTS | ARTS | PERSPECTIVES | COMICS
CLASSIFIEDS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT US | SEARCH
Webmaster - webmaster@wildcat.arizona.edu
© Copyright 2001 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat - Arizona Student Media