Arizona Daily Wildcat Online
sections
Front Page
News
Opinions
· Columnists
Sports
· Men's Hoops
Go Wild
Live Culture
Police Beat
Datebook
Comics
Crossword
Special Sections
Photo Spreads
Classifieds
The Wildcat
Letter to the Editor
Wildcat Staff
Search
Archives
Job Openings
Advertising Info
Student Media
Arizona Student Media Info
UATV -
Student TV
 
KAMP -
Student Radio
The Desert Yearbook
Daily Wildcat Staff Alumni

University funding bill meets opposition


By Andrea Kelly
Arizona Daily Wildcat
Tuesday, March 8, 2005
Print this

Phoenix - Though the UA South campus elimination was taken out of consideration, a university funding bill that passed in a House of Representatives committee yesterday still met some foes.

The bill, as it reads now, would create a formula for university enrollment-growth funding based on the number of full-time students, allow community colleges to offer certain four-year baccalaureate degrees, and eliminate provisional community college districts, among other changes.

Most community colleges supported the bill because it would give them the ability to offer four-year degrees in law enforcement services, fire services, health professions such as nursing, teacher education, and any area that is workforce-related and that the universities do not offer four-year degrees for.

The bill would limit the community colleges in that they could only create four-year bachelor's degrees for areas in which they already offer a two-year associate's degree.

The three university presidents sent a letter to the members of a House Appropriations committee last week stating, while they supported the effort representatives were making, all of the answers to university funding problems were not encompassed in the bill.

"We appreciate the efforts to address various issues related to higher education in Arizona," said the letter, signed by all three university presidents and the president of the Arizona Board of Regents.

The letter said the proposal for funding based on full-time students, or enrollment growth, was "certainly headed in the right direction," but the presidents wanted confirmation on where the funding would come from.

"Any adjustments to the per-student funding formula should include a clear indication of the funding source," the letter said. In other proposals, "we were concerned with funding enrollment growth out of a major portion of tuition collections, and we continue to have those concerns."

The letter also said the "total overhaul" of funding and four-year degrees "should be approached with thoughtfulness and caution," and the presidents supported additional financial aid funding.

Last week the bill included the elimination of UA's south campus in Sierra Vista, but Greg Fahey, UA lobbyist, said President Peter Likins expressed his adamant opposition clearly to members of the committee, including the bill sponsor, and when the bill was formally considered yesterday, the elimination was no longer a part of it.

The biggest opposition to the bill came from citizens and local government of Payson. They were against another elimination proposed in the bill, that of Gila County Provisional Community College, a community college in Payson.

Provisional community colleges are not able to award degrees and must work with another college, in this case, Pima Community College, to award students' degrees.

The bill proposes the elimination of all provisional community colleges, though the only one in the state is in Payson.

If passed, the bill, HB2079, would use tax funds that now go to the provisional community colleges to fund out-of-county tuition at other state community colleges.

Rep. John Allen, R-Scottsdale, said he proposed the elimination because that college is not doing its job.

"This system has gone from 950 (students) to 400," Allen said. "It's not exactly serving its community in the way we had hoped."

The bill passed the committee by an 8-5 vote, and will go on to another committee before it faces a vote in the full House of Representatives.

The "no" votes came from representatives who said they were concerned with a lot of the issues in the bill, including the elimination of the community college in Payson, the affect various parts of the bill would have on universities and community colleges individually, and the lack of input they felt those two groups had in the creation of the bill.

Rep. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, chairman of the committee, assured those members that the bill was still "a work in progress," and would continue to be amended as various parties' concerns were addressed.



Write a Letter to the Editor
articles
Presidential candidates square off in Gallagher
divider
Committee: Candidate fired from ASUA post
divider
BIO5 building adds last steel beam
divider
Sculpture artist's proceeds to benefit KUAT
divider
Intoxicated students close to getting rides home
divider
Provost presents program fee consideration guidelines
divider
Forum held to decide fate of art museum
divider
University funding bill meets opposition
divider
Business program fee survey results to be presented to ABOR
divider
ASUA remains a mystery for many students
divider
On the spot!
divider
Fast facts
divider
Police Beat
divider
Datebook
divider
Restaurant and Bar Guide
Housing Guide
Search for:
advanced search Archives

NEWS | SPORTS | OPINIONS | GO WILD
CLASSIFIEDS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT US | SEARCH



Webmaster - webmaster@wildcat.arizona.edu
Copyright 2005 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat - Arizona Student Media