Contact Us

Advertising

Comics

Crossword

The Arizona Daily Wildcat Online

Catcalls

Policebeat

Search

Archives

News Sports Opinions Arts Classifieds

Monday March 5, 2001

Basketball site
Elton John

 

PoliceBeat
Catcalls
Restaurant and Bar Guide
Daily Wildcat Alumni Site

 

Student KAMP Radio and TV 3

Arizona Student Media Website

Pharmaceutical companies sue South Africa over patent law

By Associated Press

JOHANNESBURG, South Africa - Nearly every major pharmaceutical company in the world is suing the government of South Africa in a case viewed as a landmark in the battle to get cheap AIDS medication to many of the world's poorest countries.

The more than three dozen companies argue that a 1997 South African law allowing the government to import or produce cheap, generic versions of patented drugs is too broad and unfairly targets drug manufacturers. They plan to ask the Pretoria High Court to invalidate the law in hearings beginning today.

The government, AIDS activists and international human rights groups say the drug companies are trying to wring profits out of a public health nightmare that threatens to devastate South Africa and dozens of other impoverished countries.

The case is about whether "the commercial interests of the companies or the human rights of the people who are trying to stay alive" is more important, said Belinda Coote, regional director of the relief agency Oxfam.

More than 25 million of the 36 million people infected with HIV live in sub-Saharan Africa, one of the world's most impoverished regions. In 2000, 2.4 million people in the region died from the effects of AIDS.

These statistics, coupled with a perception that some drug companies care more about stopping the spread of generic drugs than the spread of HIV, have damaged the industry's standing.

"I don't think it's good for their image and I think that a lot of them will just eventually give these drugs away," said Henry Grabowski, professor of economics at Duke University.

But access to AIDS medication has proven an embarrassing issue for the government and the United States as well.

Under former President Nelson Mandela, South Africa was criticized for spending millions of dollars of its precious health budget on a controversial AIDS awareness play and developing its own AIDS medication, Virodene, which was found to contain an industrial solvent.

The new government has yet to make a relatively inexpensive course of anti-retroviral medication widely available to pregnant woman to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV.

When South Africa passed a law in 1997 giving the health minister a limited right to import generic versions of patented drugs or license their domestic production, the U.S. government put South Africa on a watch list for trade sanctions.

After AIDS activists repeatedly embarrassed Vice President Al Gore with the issue at the start of his presidential campaign, the government reversed itself, agreeing to support South Africa as long as the law was applied consistently with international trade regulations.

The law has never been applied, however, because of the lawsuit.

The case is not about "patents versus patients" and has little to do with AIDS, said Mirryena Deeb, head of the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of South Africa, which is part of the lawsuit.

Under the law, the health minister would have the authority to essentially invalidate the patents of any medicine, she said, destroying the companies' profits and their efforts to recoup their costs for developing the drugs.

"This fight is about broad powers, arbitrary powers and a law that we still don't know what it means," Deeb said.

The government says the industry is overreacting, and the health minister would invoke the law only in times of emergency - such as now.

"The intention of this act is simply to ensure that South Africa meets its constitutional obligation to provide health care to all South Africans," said Dr. Ayanti Ntsaluba, director general of South Africa's health ministry.

But the pharmaceutical industry says South Africa has been unwilling to take advantage of several companies' offers of vastly reduced prices for their AIDS drugs.

South Africa says it has been negotiating, but even the reduced prices would bankrupt its health budget.

The pharmaceutical industry says it is not the cost of the medicines that is preventing their distribution, but the lack of a health care infrastructure in many areas of South Africa.

If the drugs were cheap, though, South Africa would improve its infrastructure to deliver them, AIDS activists said. And many urban areas have the facilities to monitor AIDS patients - they just need the medicine.

"The time has come for the pharmaceutical industry and the governments who represent them in trade disputes to acknowledge that the world is facing an extraordinary challenge," The Lancet medical journal said in a Jan. 27 editorial.