Arizona Daily Wildcat advertising info
UA news
world news
sports
arts
perspectives
comics
crossword
cat calls
police beat
photo features
special reports
classifieds
archives
search
advertising

UA Basketball
Housing Guide - Spring 2002
restaurant, bar and party guide
FEEDBACK
Write a letter to the Editor

Contact the Daily Wildcat staff

Send feedback to the web designers


AZ STUDENT MEDIA
Arizona Student Media info...

Daily Wildcat staff alumni...

TV3 - student tv...

KAMP - student radio...

Wildcat Online Banner

Condit's wife demands apology for 'Law & Order' episode

Associated Press
Thursday Mar. 7, 2002

LOS ANGELES - The producers of "Law & Order" rejected a demand from Rep. Gary Condit's wife that they apologize for an episode about a politician and a missing aide.

"We believe there's no basis for her claim. The show is fictional," said Neil Schubert, spokesman for Studios USA, which produces the series for NBC.

The network concurred with the studio's announcement yesterday, an NBC spokeswoman said. The episode aired Feb. 6 and carried the series' standard disclaimer that the story "does not depict any actual person or event."

Attorneys for Studios USA are investigating the matter and plan to respond, Schubert said.

The decision came a day after Condit lost his re-election bid for the congressional seat he has held for six terms. In the Democratic primary, he was swamped by state Assemblyman Dennis Cardoza.

Chandra Levy, 24, vanished last May. Police sources say Condit admitted having an affair with the Washington intern, but that he is not a suspect in her disappearance.

In the "Law & Order" episode, a 24-year-old aide to a state senator disappears from her Manhattan apartment. The ending implies that the wife of another official, the state gaming board chairman, was involved in her death.

A letter titled "Demand for Retraction" was sent to "Law & Order" executive producer Dick Wolf and to NBC attorneys Feb. 26 by the Los Angeles-based law firm of Johnson & Rishwain, which represents Carolyn Condit.

"It is undeniable that the viewing public would identify Mrs. Condit as the wife depicted on the episode," said the letter, which calls the episode "defamatory."

Mrs. Condit wants a retraction aired that apologizes to her on behalf of NBC and states that there is no factual basis to assert that Mrs. Condit ever contacted Levy or was involved in her disappearance.

Attorney Brian A. Rishwain said yesterday that the statement should be featured at the start of a "Law & Order" episode airing reasonably soon.

Told that the studio and network had rejected the demand, Rishwain said: "We either go away or file a lawsuit."

Rishwain said he hadn't spoken to Mrs. Condit yesterday. She did not return messages left by The Associated Press at the family's home.

Rishwain's firm has also filed a $10 million lawsuit on behalf of Mrs. Condit over a National Enquirer headline and story that Rishwain said implied she had spoken to and attacked Levy. He said Levy and Mrs. Condit have never spoken or met, he said.

"Law & Order" is known for "ripped-from-the-headlines" plots that are drawn from news stories. Last year, an episode about violence during New York's Puerto Rican Day parade provoked complaints from Hispanic groups and drew an apology from NBC.

ARTICLES

advertising info

UA NEWS | WORLD NEWS | SPORTS | ARTS | PERSPECTIVES | COMICS
CLASSIFIEDS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT US | SEARCH
Webmaster - webmaster@wildcat.arizona.edu
© Copyright 2001 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat - Arizona Student Media