Arizona Daily Wildcat Online
sections
Front Page
News
Sports
· Basketball
Opinions
· Columnists
Live Culture
GoWild
Police Beat
Datebook
Comics
Crossword
Online Crossword
Photo Spreads
Special Sections
Classifieds
The Wildcat
Letter to the Editor
Wildcat staff
Search
Archives
Job Openings
Advertising Info
Student Media
Arizona Student Media info
UATV - student TV
KAMP - student radio
The Desert Yearbook
Daily Wildcat staff alumni

News
ASUA presidential candidates face off in Court over election violations


Photo
EVAN CARAVELLI/Arizona Daily Wildcat
Josh Shapiro, right, who lost his bid for ASUA president last week, testifies before the ASUA Supreme Court Friday night, as his former opponent and now president-elect, Alistair Chapman, listens. Shapiro contested that the election was unfair, alleging violations on the part of Chapman and the ASUA elections commissioner.
By Natasha Bhuyan
Arizona Daily Wildcat
Monday, March 8, 2004
Print this

Over the weekend, Alistair Chapman nearly lost his position as next year's student body president.

But a technicality might have saved him.

Josh Shapiro, Chapman's opponent in the March elections, filed 16 elections code violations against Chapman this weekend. Chapman filed two against Shapiro.

Had Chapman been found guilty of four of the violations, he would have been disqualified from the presidency.

But 14 of the 16 charges against Chapman were dismissed because Shapiro failed to provide specific details of the violations. After finding out the charges against him were dropped, Chapman dropped the two claims against Shapiro.

The Supreme Court held two trials this weekend to hear the allegations against Chapman.

Chapman was found guilty of holding a campaign party at Coconuts, a bar on North Stone Avenue, and fined $25.

According to Section 5-100.02 of the 2004 ASUA Elections Code, a candidate may not campaign off campus at an age-restrictive establishment.

Chapman was found innocent of the other allegation, failing to report his Web site on his expense form.

Although Chapman said Campus Magazine hosted the party only as a social event, Shapiro said it was a campaign party for Chapman because the D.J. announced twice to "vote for Alistair."

Chapman admitted that he or a member of his campaign staff might have initiated the announcement.

Kathleen Rapp, an ASUA Supreme Court associate justice, asked Chapman if he believed there was a distinction in his mind between him and members of his staff, to which Chapman replied, "No, I am in charge of them."

Later, Chapman admitted the party was a violation of the elections code, but said his penalty should be a $25 fine, in accordance with the elections code.

Because the trial only concerned the Coconuts campaign party, the ASUA Supreme Court did not hear other grievances or election codes violations Friday.

On Saturday, Shapiro filed 15 additional allegations against Chapman while Chapman filed two against Shapiro.

Another trial was held last night to hear these claims; however, 14 of Shapiro's 15 claims were dismissed because ASUA Supreme Court Chief Justice Erin Borg said Shapiro lacked specific details about the violations.

Shapiro said it was unfair that all but one of his claims against Chapman were dismissed on a small technicality, but Sam Daughety, an associate justice, said Shapiro was "provided ample latitude in this case."

Shapiro said he was frustrated with the decision.

"I'm not a lawyer or in law school, and I don't have friends who are in law school, so I didn't know the exact way to file the complaints," he said. "I'm frustrated that the presidency of the student body is decided by a technicality."

Before the trial began, Chapman announced he wanted to drop his two claims against Shapiro.

Chapman said the only reason he filed the allegations was to have counterclaims against Shapiro.

At the second trial, Shapiro said Chapman violated Section 3-200.01 of the elections code because he did not declare his Web site on his expense form. Shapiro said if Chapman used the help of a professional, it must be stated in the form.

But Chapman said he built the site on his own, so it was not necessary for him to report it on the expense form.

ASUA presidential candidates cannot spend more than $325 on elections.

Blake Buchanan, former executive vice presidential candidate and an ASUA senator, was called to the witness stand to verify that Chapman did indeed build the site, which took him four or five days to complete.

Although Shapiro still has the option of filing grievances against Dan Suh, ASUA elections commissioner, he said he would not do so.

"Everyone is ready to be done with this," Chapman said after the trial.



Write a Letter to the Editor
articles
ASUA presidential candidates face off in Court over election violations
divider
Student shot with pellet gun at La Paz
divider
Iraqi students settling in at UA
divider
Student arrested for dorm drug sales
divider
'Dirt' a dirty word for UA prof
divider
Fat Tuesday closes abruptly
divider
'Hilarious, vulgar' show celebrates women's sexuality
divider
Doctors concerned with patients' health illiteracy
divider
On the spot
divider
Fastfacts
divider
Flashback
divider
Police Beat
divider
Datebook
divider
Restaurant and Bar guide
Search for:
advanced search Archives
CAMPUS NEWS | SPORTS | OPINIONS
CLASSIFIEDS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT US | SEARCH


Webmaster - webmaster@wildcat.arizona.edu
© Copyright 2003 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat - Arizona Student Media