Arizona Daily Wildcat Online
sections
Front Page
News
Sports
· Basketball
Opinions
· Columnists
Live Culture
GoWild
Police Beat
Datebook
Comics
Crossword
Photo Spreads
Special Sections
Classifieds
The Wildcat
Letter to the Editor
Wildcat staff
Search
Archives
Job Openings
Advertising Info
Student Media
Arizona Student Media info
UATV - student TV
KAMP - student radio
The Desert Yearbook
Daily Wildcat staff alumni

News
You won't remember 'The Alamo'


Photo
Photo courtesy of Touchstone Pictures
Patrick Wilson, Billy Bob Thorton, and Jason Patric star in "The Alamo," a film about the Alamo that viewers will probably forget.
By Celeste Meiffren
Arizona Daily Wildcat
Thursday, April 15, 2004
Print this

The Alamo bit. Only one person in the whole theater enjoyed the movie when I saw it, and he was sporting a "Don't Mess With Texas" shirt, an "I Love Dubya" hat and working on a Texas Instruments calculator for the better part of an hour. That last part's a lie. Apologies.

The beginning of the movie starts with the end, when all of the characters we will come to know are dead. I just don't understand why the filmmaker decided to give away the ending like that. That way, everyone in the theater knows exactly what's going to happen. It's a strange tactic to be sure.

The director, John Lee Hancock (a joke is here, but I can't find it), uses another strange tactic in this movie. He shows how unlikable and flawed all the characters are from the get-go. James Bowie, played by Jason Patric, has a drinking problem and tuberculosis. William Travis, played by Patrick Wilson, ran out on his wife and left his kid in a foster home. Davy Crockett, played by the very sexy Billy Bob Thorton, ate American Indians. I wish I was joking, but I'm not. What I'm saying is that if you don't really like the characters throughout the movie, what's the point?

So, this band of men defends the Alamo against Santa Anna (Emilio Echevarria) and his large army, Mexicano.

If you go...

Rated: PG-13
137 min.
Now playing

I guess the reason this movie blew so hard was because it was boring. There were 15-minute intervals with no action, no music and a small amount of trite dialogue. I felt like a child with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder must feel in history class in junior high. Or any child, for that matter.

There was one impressive scene in the whole movie, when it culminates in the final battle and everyone dies. The cinematography was impressive. I give props where props are due.

In order to entertain myself throughout the movie, I came up with little nicknames for all the random supporting characters. There is a man in the beginning with an absolutely enormous head, so I named him "pancake face." There was a Mexican

soldier who told a woman to shush as though he was trying to seduce her, and so I named him "creepy child molester." And finally, one of the main characters had such a strong Southern drawl that I named him Billy Bob - until I realized that it was his real name.

Overall, the movie made me feel tired about Hollywood, Texas and America. I respect the story, but I don't think this movie really did it justice. It definitely could have been better, but it would have had to try really hard to be worse.



Write a Letter to the Editor
articles
Film festival makes Tucson a cinema paradise
divider
'Opera' is best of shows
divider
'Spoon' singer goes solo
divider
Repent, UA; the end is exhibited near
divider
Nintendo cover band got game
divider
No Fourth Avenue? No Worries This Crawl
divider
'Horrors' horribly funny
divider
2 sides to the same 'Bill'
divider
You won't remember 'The Alamo'
divider
Music Reviews
divider
Tucson and Campus Calendar
divider
Housing Guide
University of Arizona Visitor's Guide
Restaurant and Bar guide
Search for:
advanced search Archives
CAMPUS NEWS | SPORTS | OPINIONS
CLASSIFIEDS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT US | SEARCH


Webmaster - webmaster@wildcat.arizona.edu
© Copyright 2003 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat - Arizona Student Media