Arizona Daily Wildcat Online
sections
Front Page
News
Sports
· Basketball
Opinions
· Columnists
Live Culture
GoWild
Police Beat
Datebook
Comics
Crossword
Online Crossword
Photo Spreads
Special Sections
Classifieds
The Wildcat
Letter to the Editor
Wildcat staff
Search
Archives
Job Openings
Advertising Info
Student Media
Arizona Student Media info
UATV - student TV
KAMP - student radio
The Desert Yearbook
Daily Wildcat staff alumni

News
Push back closing time before last call


By Opinions Board
Arizona Daily Wildcat
Tuesday, February 10, 2004
Print this

The bill currently in the Arizona Legislature that would push the state's last call back to 2 a.m. fails to adequately address safety issues resulting from a later cutoff for alcohol sales.

Rep. Michele Reagan, R-Scottsdale, is sponsoring a bill that would change Arizona's last call from the current cutoff of 1 a.m. to 2 a.m. The bill has gained support in the Legislature and looks as if it may make it to the governor's desk.

Bars' closing time, which is currently 1:15 a.m., would be extended to 2:30 a.m. under the new law.

Though the bill adds an extra hour of drinking time for bar patrons, they only gain 15 additional minutes to sober up after closing. Because of this, it seems the bill focuses primarily on the financial benefits of the proposed change without taking the safety risk into account.

Reagan argues that the bill would boost Arizona's tourist economy by attracting more large business conventions. She also contends that giving bar patrons a half-hour between last call and closing time, rather than the current 15 minutes, would decrease the amount of drunken drivers.

Many bar owners agree. They claim the current 1 a.m. last call promotes binge drinking by forcing bar patrons to get drunk quicker.

But it's disingenuous to suggest that adding another hour of drinking time will result in Arizona's drinkers moderating their drinking. In reality, another hour of drinking time will likely result in simply another hour of drinking. This would make the streets less safe because it seems unreasonable to say that an additional 15 minutes of sobering up will counteract an added hour of imbibing.

Grounds exist for extending Arizona's drinking time - Phoenix, Tucson and Mesa are three of only four top-50 cities with a 1 a.m. last call. But if and when such a change is made, it should ensure a safety increase commensurate with the economic benefit.

If the Legislature wants to push back last call to 2 a.m., bar closing time should be later than 2:30 a.m. Bars should stay open later in order to ensure the safety of their own patrons.

More importantly, bars should stay open later to ensure the party the bill overlooks most - Arizona's non-drinkers - stays safe on the streets of the state, at any hour.


OPINIONS BOARD

Opinions are determined by the Wildcat opinions board and written by one of its members. They are Shane Dale, Caitlin Hall, Saul Loeb, Jason Poreda, Justin St. Germain and Eliza Tebo.



Write a Letter to the Editor
articles
Mailbag
divider
Connecting The Dots: Push back last call? Let's drink to that!
divider
Talking Back: Halftime show makes boobs of us all
divider
Push back closing time before last call
divider
Restaurant and Bar guide
Search for:
advanced search Archives
CAMPUS NEWS | SPORTS | OPINIONS
CLASSIFIEDS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT US | SEARCH


Webmaster - webmaster@wildcat.arizona.edu
© Copyright 2003 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat - Arizona Student Media