A vote for Salmon against principles for Libertarians
I appreciate Shane Dale's Nov. 4 column titled "Calling all Libertarians: We need your help," which was written "just for us Libertarians." I feel the need to explain to Dale why I did not vote for Matt Salmon in Tuesday's election.
Before every election, the voting public is lulled into believing that the country will be ruined over the course of the next two to four years, unless we vote for the "Republicrat," whose name is preceded by the correct letter. However, the voters who judge government policy based on a consistent set of principles can see that the overwhelming number of issues affecting our everyday lives are never even brought up in the "debates." While the Republicrats appear to argue about whether or not the words "under God" should appear in the Pledge of Allegiance, the necessary debate about the constitutionality of federally subsidized education is silenced. Other key freedom issues such as self-defense (i.e., gun rights), criminal procedure, land use and government licensing are not even subject to a vote, let alone brought up for discussion.
[Read article]